李海龙;

• 1:山东大学政治学与公共管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

在国际社会中,国家对国际制度和规范遵守包含两个内在动力:理性选择动力和社会建构动力。因此,国际制度中的合法性具有两方面的含义:工具合法性与价值合法性。一般而言,国家对合法性的第一层面的追求比较明显,但是对价值合法性的追求则比较隐晦和困难。然而,第二层含义是权力合法性的本质所在,对其无视甚至践踏会引起其他行为体的不满。文章的目的就是利用国际领域中的合法性和国际制度理论,分析2003年对伊拉克战争后,美国的合法性和国际声誉的丧失问题。其本质原因是美国追求和使用国际制度中的工具合法性,而忽视或者违背其价值合法性。

关键词(KeyWords)： 国际制度;国际法;合法性;伊拉克战争

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 山东大学海外留学基金;; 伦敦大学学院“2009JCMS Scholarships”

作者(Authors): 李海龙;

参考文献(References)：

• ①国际制度包含的内容广泛,国际组织、国际法、国际机制都是国际制度的组成部分。参考:陈晓进.“国际制度”概念辨析[J].国际关系学院学报,2000,(4):20-23;苏长和.重新定义国际制度[J].欧洲,1999,(6):22-27.
• [1]Ian Hurd.Legiti macy and Authority in InternationalPolitics[J].International Organization,1999,53(2):379-408.
• [2]Claud,Inis L.Jr.Collective Legiti mization as a PoliticalFunction of the United Nations[J].International Or-ganization,1996,20(3):367-79.
• [3]Scott,S.V.Beyond“Compliance”:Reconceiving the In-ternational Law-Foreign Policy Dynamic[A].the Aus-tralian Year Book of International Law 1998[R].1998.35-48.
• [4]Martha Finnemore.National Interests in InternationalSociety[M].Ithaca,NY:Cornell University Press,1996.126-128.
• [5]Frank Schi mmelfennig.NATO Enlargement:A Con-structivist Explanation[Z].Security Studies,1998-1999,8:198-199.
• [6]Shirley V.Scott and Olivia Ambler.Does Legality Re-ally Matter?Accounting for the Decline in US ForeignPolicy Legiti macy Following the 2003 Invasion of Iraq[J].European Journal of International Relations,2007,13(1):67-87.
• [7]Powell,Colin.Text:Powell Says Iraq’s Non-compli-ance with UN Rulings Concerns All,2002[DB/OL].online at http://Canberra.usembassy.gov/hyper/2002/0905/epf402.ht m.
• [8]White House.Vice President speaks at VFW 103rdNational Convention.Remarks by the Vice Presidentto the Veterans of Foreign Wars 103rd National Con-vention,2002[DB/OL].online at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/08/20020826.ht ml.
• [9]UN(2003)Press Release SG/SM/8600,Secretary-General Says United Nations Has Duty to Exhaust AllPossibilities of Peaceful Settlement Before Resortingto Use of Force[DB/OL].online at http://www.un.org.
• [10]Stromseth,J.E.Law and Force after Iraq:A Transi-tional Moment[J].The American Journal of Interna-tional Law,2003,97(3):628-42.
• [11]Stahn,C.Enforcement of the Collective Will after Iraq[J].The American Journal of International Law,2003,97(4):804-23.
• [12]Crook,C.The War in Iraq and the Wisdom of Hind-sight[J/OL].National Journal 2004,36(22);online athttp://nationaljournal.com/.
• [13]UK House of Commons Select Committee on ForeignAffairs(2000)Fourth Report[DB/OL].online at ht-tp://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmfaff/28/2813.ht m#a34.
• [14]US Senate Committee on Intelligence.Report on theUSIntelligence Community’s Prewar Intelligence As-sessments on Iraq:Conclusions,2004[DB/OL].on-line at http://intelligence.senate.gov/.
• [15]Alexander Gheciu.NATO in the New Europe,ThePolitics of International Socialization after the ColdWar[M].Stanford University Press,2005.232.
• [16]James M.Goldgeier and Michael McFaul.A Tale ofTwo Worlds:Core and Periphery in the Post-ColdWar Era[J].International Organization,1992,46(2):467-91.