ISDS机制在欧盟的困境及使用当地救济的回归The Dilemma of ISDS in the EU and the Return of Using Local Relief
杨帆;
摘要(Abstract):
《里斯本条约》的生效使欧盟在直接投资领域取得专属权能,并在国际投资领域发挥着重要作用。在受到投资仲裁正当性危机以及投资仲裁对欧盟公共政策、法律秩序造成的负面影响下,欧盟一方面在新订立的投资协定中加快对投资者—国家争端解决机制(ISDS)的改革,另一方面也鼓励外国投资者通过使用"当地救济"来解决投资争议以减少负面影响。而欧洲法院和成员国法院可能赋予国际投资协定以直接效力,这将进一步提高投资者使用当地救济的积极性。
关键词(KeyWords): 公共政策;欧盟法律秩序的自治性;当地救济;直接效力;投资仲裁机制
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社科基金重点资助项目“海外安全利益法律保护的中国模式研究”(13AFX028)
作者(Authors): 杨帆;
参考文献(References):
- [1]Wenhua Shan,Sheng Zhang.The treaty of Lisbon:Half way toward a common investment policy[J].European Journal of International Law,2010,21(4):1049-1073.
- [2]于湛旻.论国际投资仲裁中仲裁员身份冲突及克服[J].河北法学,2014(7):133-141.
- [3]郑蕴,徐崇利.论国际投资法体系的碎片化结构与性质[J].现代法学,2015(1):162-171.
- [4]Statement of the Free Trade Commission on Non-disputing Party Participation[EB/OL].[2010-07-31].http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.
- [5]UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration[EB/OL].[2014-12-13].http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ruleson-transparency/Rules-on-Transparency-E.
- [6]Consolidated CETA text[EB/OL].[2014-09-29].http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/september/tradoc_152806.
- [7]刘笋.国际法人本化趋势与国际投资法革新[J].法学研究,2011(4):196-208.
- [8]彭岳.国际投资中的间接征收及其认定[J].复旦学报:社会科学版,2009(2):64-72.
- [9]Investor-State Dispute Settlement Provisions in the EU’s International Investment Agreement[EB/OL].[2015-04-01].http://www.europarl.europa.eu/Reg Data/etudes/STVD/2014/534979/EXPO_STU(2014)534979_EN.
- [10]Ralph Alexander Lorz.Germany,the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and investmentdispute settlement:Observations on a paradox[EB/OL].[2014-09-23].http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2013/10/No-132-Lorz-FINAL.
- [11]Finbarr Bermingham.European Commission Denies Reports that Germany is Derailing Ceta[EB/OL].[2014-09-23].http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/european-commission-denies-reports-that-germany-derailing-ceta-1466862.
- [12]Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement in EU agreements[EB/OL].[2014-12-04].http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/november/tradoc_151916.
- [13]Investment Provision in the Eu-Canada Free Trade Agreement(CETA)[EB/OL].[2014-09-26].http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/november/tradoc_151918.
- [14]曾令良.欧洲联盟法总论:以《欧洲宪法条约》为新视角[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007:80,310.
- [15]Ramses A.Wessel,Steven Blockmans.Between Autonomy and Dependence[M].New York:Springer,2013:13-46.
- [16]Marc Bungenberg,Jorn Griebel,Steffen Hindelang.International Investment Law and EU Law[M].New York:Springer,2011:71-76.
- [17]Smaranda Miron.The Last Bite of the BITs-Supremacy of EU Law versus Investment Treaty Arbitration[J].European Law Journal,2014,20(3):332-345.
- [18]On the Future European International Investment Policy[EB/OL].[2011-03-22].http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A7-2011-0070+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN.
- [19]Volume 1-Workshop.Investor-State Dispute Settlement(ISDS)Provisions in the EU International Investment Agreement[EB/OL].[2014-09-10].http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/534979-/EXPO_STU(2014)534979_EN.
- [20]Angelos Dimopoulos.The Common Commercial Policy After Lisbon:Establishing Parallelism Between Internal and External Economic Relations?[J].Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy,2008,4(4):101-129.
- [21]曾令良.论欧共体法与成员国法的关系[J].法学论坛,2003(4):79.
- [22]Alison Jones,Brenda Sufrin.EU Competition Law:Text Cases and Materials[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2010:207.
- [23]Francesca Martines.Direct Effect of International Agreements of the European Union[M].European Journal of International Law,2014,25(1):129-147.